Corporate Accountability CRP :: essays research papers

philosophical system Corporate AccountabilityCorporate accountability is an important subject in todays society, in reading Corporate Culpability at a lower place the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, by Jennifer Moore it is obvious that she feels very strongly that corporations argon not being held accountable for their actions. Jennifer argues that employees are often blamed for their actions, but are plain complying with their job. This is very insightful, and I find it very hard to disagree with her logic. She starts her argument by rejecting the idea that it is sometimes difficult to locate the specialised incarnate agents responsible for a criminal act (171). The rejection is not meant to vulgarize that it is always easy to find the person at blame, but simply that this point has to do with prosecutors evidence and not the philosophical issue. Jennifer believes that because responsibility is gap throughout many different areas in the corporation, and decisions follow th e same path, at that place may in fact be no individual or group of individuals that is justly to blame for the crime (171). The idea that many of us notice everyday, in many cases we as employees act blindly in accordance with policy, not exerting any control over the situations, and can and then not be held accountable. In this respect the corporation is to be held accountable.From my viewpoint, spell I represent the familiarity during work hours, and the company reaps the benefits of my good nature, they should besides bear the responsibility of my actions. If I treat a customer rudely, the customer treats that as an indication of my character, and a reflection on the company. When a person enters employment with a certain company, that company is accepting responsibility for actions taken by the employee that are in accordance with company policy. The corporation should be held responsible by the government, while the corporation should hold its witness employees respons ible for their own actions. In response to the idea of a corporate responsibility, not an individuals, many argue that if the corporation is not a person, how can it be held to the same moral guidelines as an individual? aft(prenominal) all, dont people put one over the decisions, and those same people make up the corporations, and should therefore be held accountable. This theory does not exclude the casualty of upper management being held responsible rather it includes it for the sake of the companys survival.