Objective Reality Cannot Exist Without Subjective Reality Essay

The topic of Meta-Ethics pertaining to whether moral values are object or subjective, and whether or non as a ordering we should be able to intervene on another society if we do not believe what they are doing is mor tout ensembley ethical, is quite a large topic. How laughingstock we come up with a solid resolution as to whether or not at that place are global human values, and whether certain things should be considered right-hand(a) for every wholeness are very difficult passs to answer, we moldiness be wakeful as to not insult different cultures, religions and societies. It has been concluded that an target area public cannot exist without a subjective reality, in order to r all(prenominal) this conclusion, we mustiness first consider that godliness is wholly subjective, if this is so, we cannot call anything wrong, what we believe is right or wrong is simply an individuals reliance on a subject.As an example, if someone killed several children from an elementary s chool, if morality is subjective, all anyone is able to say is that from an individual perspective it was wrong, from the perspective of the killer it whitethorn go been (in their opinion) the highest moral good. However, if reality is objective, then we can say that what the killer did was wrong. If one believes that killing is something that is truly wrong, then you believe in objective moral value, and in that case one must pray how further do objective morals stretch, and where do they come from? If one believes that the legal injury of killing is simply a matter of perspective, then one should ask why does society begin the right to tell me what to do if morality is merely a matter of perspective? We cannot truthfully choose one way to work out at the world, because the world is not black and white, there are many grey areas and many exceptions people would have to their beliefs, because of this we cannot have an objective reality without a subjective reality.Let us look a t the cultural differences on morality, if a north American(male) citizen is asked the question Should women have the same rights as men? the answer would more than in all probability be yes, if however this question was asked to a Saudi Arabian (male) citizen, the answer would more than likely be no. Whose opinion is correct? The North American would say their opinion is, and the Saudi Arabian would say their opinion is. In this point, do we as North Americans have the right to apply our views on another society when we believe their views are wrong? The scarce reason one could justify imposing their societies views on another society is if that society is giving a different gender, race, or persons with a different sexuality the same rights. In this example it would be that Saudi Arabia does not give women the same rights as men.In this situation human rights and equality are involved, and another society should interfere in order to attend the individuals who do not have t he equal rights. As North Americans we could say that this is not our problem, and that because it is not our culture or society, we have no right to interfere. Saudi Arabia would most likely agree, we have no right to interfere, and that it is there culture, society and religion, thus it is up to them to decide how to live, hardly simply put in the case of human rights, it is not a matter of society culture, or religion, human rights are a universal issue and as people, we cannot let other people be treated as less than us. All human beings are born complimentary and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and moral sense and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood. (Universal solution of Human Rights, article 1)Simply put, the only articles in the Universal resolving power of Human Rights that should be kept and enforced are those pertaining to human rights, equality and freedom. Any other articles included should be disregarded, and laws s hould be decided by country. It is very important that we begin to enforce the human rights and equality articles to each country because these are the most important to the human race as a whole, we must advance our societies, and our people together, and societies with more advanced backup and understand should willingly help societies that have not yet make it there. We as people should feel incredibly sad, and motivated to help when we let on other people who are not being treated as equals, anyone of us could be in that situation, and we should be grateful we are not. We must do allwe can as a society to help those in need. It is crucial that all countries begin to work together in order to help those who are not being treated with the rights they deserve.