Further option for chinas farmland reform(chinese translation included) :: essays research papers

Options for set ahead Re corpse in Chinas Farm add Systemfrom "Report of a pilot lamp study on poverty, impose abandonment and rural institutions", produced by the surgical incision of International Cooperation, Ministry of Agriculture, Peoples Republic of China, in collaboration with the FAO Rural Development class THE FUNDAMENTAL ISSUE in the setup of Chinas existing rural tillage system centres on ambiguity in the definition of land possession rights. Despite stipulations in the Constitution and Land Management Law, specifying that rural land is owned by the bodied, it is nevertheless un pinch which of the "three take aims of proprietorship in the collective -- Peoples Communes, production brigades and production groups - is referred to. Furthermore, even if it had designated the self-control to a certain level in the collective, the problem would again emerge from the lack of a clear scope of the collective and its membership. Added to this ambiguity in the o wnership of land is the soreness of the principal land property right, as the State has the authority to thresh about of the land, while the farmer occupies the rental in deign, resulting in a drain on land revenue and difficulties in land circulation. Therefore, it is necessary to review the unharmed process of changes in the farmland system and find the correct nous of departure for straighten out. In fact, such issues as egalitarian occupation of land, disordered land management, instability in farmland contracts and lack of circulation or susceptibility have all resulted from an ambiguous land ownership. Once the land owner is clearly defined and the principal property rights affirmed, then, the farmlands management, sale, leasing (including farmers contracting of collective land and re-contracting of their contracted land), inheriting and disposal as gift -- all these and opposite matters of management and circulation would be easily resolved. --- Sticking to and perfe cting collective ownershipAs to the direction of future reform in Chinas rural farmland ownership, thither have been controversial views from academic circles and the agricultural sector, both of whom have come forth with many different ideas. These include the nationalization of rural farmland, reform and improvement of the existing collective ownership of rural land, private ownership of farmland as well as a system of assorted ownership. Based on the characteristics of Chinas rural land resources and its people-land human relationship, the direction of reform in the countrys rural land system should be the quest for a form of collective public ownership characterized by a new relationship in property rights (under the precondition of the collective public ownership of land) for the mapping of enhancing the clarity in the relationship of collective land property rights.